vendor-reviewsecurityprocurement

Vendor Scorecard: Which Headphone Makers Have the Best Security Track Record?

ddisks

2026-02-04

12 min read

Vendor scorecard for headphones: security transparency, patch speed, disclosure and procurement guidance after WhisperPair (Jan 2026).

Hook: Why your headphones are now a procurement security risk

If you manage procurement for a development team, remote workforce or call center, you already know that endpoint security goes far beyond laptops and phones. The January 2026 WhisperPair disclosures — a set of vulnerabilities in Google Fast Pair implementations that affected headphones from Sony, Anker, Nothing and others — make the risk concrete: microphones can be turned on, audio injected, and devices tracked by attackers within Bluetooth range. For procurement teams buying at scale, that translates into operational risk, compliance exposure, and hard questions about vendor trust.

Executive summary: Fast answers for busy procurement teams

Below you’ll find a vendor scorecard focused on four operational metrics procurement cares about: security transparency, patch speed, vulnerability disclosure practices, and enterprise friendliness. We cover Sony, Anker (Soundcore/Anker Innovations), Nothing, Google and a shortlist of other popular makers (Apple, Bose, Sennheiser). The scorecard draws on the 2026 WhisperPair disclosures (KU Leuven/Wired/The Verge coverage), vendor advisories, and observed patch behavior in late 2025–early 2026.

Actionable takeaway up front: if you need headphones for sensitive or regulated work, require signed firmware updates, a documented vulnerability disclosure program, SLAs for security fixes in your procurement contracts, and an OTA/bulk update path. When immediate mitigation is needed, disable Fast Pair and enforce device policies via MDM.

Context: Why Bluetooth audio became a high-priority security vector in 2025–26

Bluetooth audio has improved user convenience dramatically with one-tap pairing services like Google Fast Pair and Apple's equivalent. But convenience can introduce attack surfaces: insecure pairing flows, weak model-number-based authentication, and inconsistent firmware signing practices across vendors.

In late 2025 and January 2026 researchers at KU Leuven publicized WhisperPair — a group of practical attacks that exploit Fast Pair implementations to silently pair, enable mics, and track accessories. Wired and The Verge covered the disclosure and noted 17 affected models reported in the coordinated disclosure. Google patched Pixel Buds quickly; other vendors varied in response and transparency.

“In less than 15 seconds, we can hijack your device,” — KU Leuven researcher Sayon Duttagupta, Wired (Jan 2026)

Scorecard methodology

We scored vendors across four dimensions important to procurement and IT security teams. Scores are qualitative (High / Moderate / Low) and based on:

Security transparency — public advisories, security pages, CVE listings, clarity about affected models.
Patch speed — observed time from coordinated disclosure or public report to vendor patch availability and reachability of firmware updates.
Vulnerability disclosure — presence of a defined disclosure policy, bug bounty program or security contact and response processes.
Enterprise friendliness — bulk firmware update mechanisms (OTA/MDM), enterprise sales/support channels, documented SLAs, and integration capabilities for device management.

We also list practical procurement requirements you should include in RFPs and contract templates.

Vendor scorecard (at-a-glance)

Google — Security transparency: High. Patch speed: High. Vulnerability disclosure: High. Enterprise friendliness: Moderate–High.
Sony — Security transparency: Moderate. Patch speed: Moderate. Vulnerability disclosure: Moderate. Enterprise friendliness: Moderate.
Anker (Soundcore) — Security transparency: Moderate. Patch speed: Moderate–Low. Vulnerability disclosure: Moderate. Enterprise friendliness: Low–Moderate.
Nothing — Security transparency: Low–Moderate. Patch speed: Low–Moderate. Vulnerability disclosure: Low–Moderate. Enterprise friendliness: Low.
Apple (AirPods) — Security transparency: High. Patch speed: High. Vulnerability disclosure: High. Enterprise friendliness: Moderate–High (MDM integration limited to platform policies).
Bose / Sennheiser (legacy audio brands) — Security transparency: Moderate–High (varies by model). Patch speed: Moderate. Vulnerability disclosure: Moderate. Enterprise friendliness: Moderate.

Detailed vendor notes and what procurement teams must know

Google

Why it ranks well: Google operates the Fast Pair protocol and has a mature security program. After the KU Leuven disclosure, Google pushed patches for Pixel Buds quickly and coordinated with researchers and partner vendors. Google publishes security advisories and maintains a public CVE feed for Pixel and accessory issues. It also provides documentation and APIs for enterprise management through Android Enterprise/Zero-touch enrollment.

Gaps: While Google controls the protocol, many third-party vendors still implement it. Procurement should verify that third-party partners apply Google-signed updates and that the vendor's firmware signing process meets your standards.

Procurement tip: Require proof of compatibility with Android Enterprise and documentation showing how vendor patches propagate to devices paired with corporate phones.

Sony

Why it scores moderate: Sony is a major consumer and professional audio vendor with formal support processes and occasional security advisories. Their devices (e.g., WH-1000XM series) were named among affected models in the WhisperPair coverage. Sony released firmware updates for select models, but historically has been less proactive in publishing full technical advisory details compared to platform vendors.

Gaps: Bulk firmware distribution channels and enterprise-grade update logs are limited. Response times can vary by region and product line.

Procurement tip: For large deployments, negotiate a vendor-managed update cadence and a firm SLA for security fixes (for example, a 30/60/90-day patch window for critical/important/normal vulnerabilities).

Anker (Soundcore)

Why it’s mixed: Anker and its Soundcore brand are highly price-competitive and frequently used in large-scale procurement for remote teams. They provide firmware updates and have an active customer support posture. In the WhisperPair event, Soundcore models were listed among affected devices. Anker's transparency and formal vulnerability reporting channels are improving but still lag platform vendors.

Gaps: OTA bulk update mechanisms for enterprise customers are not standardized. Patch rollout tracking and CVE-level advisories are sometimes absent.

Procurement tip: Ask for a documented chain-of-custody for firmware (who signs firmware, how signatures are verified on-device) and insist on pre-contract security testing or a third-party firmware audit where risk is high.

Nothing

Why caution is warranted: Nothing has built strong marketing momentum and attractive industrial design, but as a younger company it has had a mixed record on security disclosure and enterprise support. The WhisperPair disclosures named certain Nothing earbuds; the company's public advisory and patch cadence were less visible than Google's. That impacts trust for procurement in regulated environments.

Gaps: Limited enterprise update channels and less-documented vulnerability response processes. Fewer signed, public advisories and CVE mappings compared to larger vendors.

Procurement tip: If you choose Nothing, include contractual language requiring priority security patches, CVE assignment, and a security contact capable of rapid mitigation coordination.

Apple (AirPods)

Why it scores well: Apple’s ecosystem uses proprietary pairing and strong platform-level protections. Apple publishes security updates and advisories with clear CVE references and generally delivers swift platform patches. AirPods themselves have been less implicated by Fast Pair issues because they do not use Google Fast Pair.

Gaps: AirPods' enterprise management is mostly indirect — enforced through iOS/MDM policies — and AirPods lack a vendor-managed bulk firmware update API for enterprise admins.

Procurement tip: Favor AirPods for teams that are largely iOS-first and require tight platform integration. For mixed-device fleets, verify cross-platform pairing security and MDM controls.

Bose and Sennheiser

Why dependable: These legacy professional-audio brands have formal support and enterprise sales channels. They publish advisories for professional models and have more robust provisioning for business deployments.

Gaps: Consumer lines may still lack enterprise update mechanisms. As with others, response speed varies by model and region.

Procurement tip: Prioritize professional/pro models from these vendors for regulated environments; they often offer longer firmware support windows and optional managed services.

What procurement teams should demand (contract & RFP checklist)

Include the following security and operational requirements in any RFP or purchase agreement for audio accessories:

Security disclosure and patch SLA: Vendor must publish a security contact, a coordinated disclosure process, and commit to SLAs (e.g., 30 days for critical, 90 days for important) for security fixes.
Signed firmware and rollback protection: Firmware must be signed with vendor keys and the device must verify signatures; no unsigned rollbacks allowed.
OTA/bulk update capability: Provide documentation for enterprise OTA, bulk update commands, or a partner portal API to push updates at scale.
CVE and advisory mapping: Public security advisories with CVE numbers and a history of fixed vulnerabilities.
Proof of testing: Recent third-party audit reports for Bluetooth pairing flows or a statement of compliance with relevant IoT security standards.
Incident escalation and forensics: Dedicated security contact, SOC integration points, and logs showing firmware update attempts and pairing events.
Indemnity and penalties: Contractual indemnity for security incidents caused by negligent firmware and financial penalties for missed SLA targets.

Operational mitigations you can implement today

When you discover a vendor vulnerability like WhisperPair, immediate operational controls reduce exposure while waiting for vendor patches:

Disable Fast Pair in device fleets where possible (Android & ChromeOS can be managed through policy); block one-tap pairing in sensitive environments.
Enforce MDM policies to restrict Bluetooth usage or limit microphone access to approved applications.
Use wired headsets or company-managed, signed-headset models for call centers and regulated communications until patches are verified.
Inventory & monitoring: Maintain an asset inventory (including model number and firmware) for every accessory and monitor pairing events in endpoint logs and EDR.
Test patches in a staging lab: Validate vendor updates before mass rollout; confirm rollback is prevented and that the update addresses the CVE. Use clear documentation and runbooks (pair with offline documentation tools such as offline-first docs for your test plans).
Network segmentation: Keep Bluetooth-related traffic and provisioning steps on segmented networks and limit proximity-based trust zones.

Case study: How a mid-size SaaS company handled WhisperPair (anonymized)

In January 2026 a 450-seat SaaS company with hybrid teams discovered WhisperPair coverage included several headsets in their fleet. Action taken:

Immediate block: IT pushed an MDM policy to disable Fast Pair for corporate Android devices within 8 hours.
Inventory: They scanned asset tags and pulled model/firmware details from endpoint management to identify affected units in 24 hours.
Vendor coordination: Procurement opened security contacts with their vendors; Google and Apple provided rapid guidance and patches where applicable. Sony and Anker required follow-up but provided firmware updates within 10–30 days for most models.
Staged rollout: Updated firmware was tested in a 25-seat pilot lab, then pushed via vendor OTA where supported; 20% of devices required manual update at kiosks.
Contract change: Procurement added a clause requiring 90-day maximum timeline for critical patches and a dedicated contact for security incidents.

Outcome: No known interception events or data exfiltration. The company reduced future risk by negotiating better SLAs and standardizing on vendors with proven enterprise update flows.

Ranking justification & what to watch in 2026

Why Google ranks highest on this shortlist: Google both operates Fast Pair and has proven coordinated-disclosure mechanics. Platform vendors (Google, Apple) tend to be faster because they can push platform-level mitigation and have established CVE workflows. Consumer brands vary — some are very good at firmware updates (especially in professional lines), others lack enterprise distribution.

Regulatory and market trends to watch in 2026:

Regulatory pressure: Jurisdictions are increasingly requiring vulnerability disclosure timelines for connected devices and minimum cybersecurity practices for IoT (affecting headphone vendors in 2025–26).
Procurement maturity: Enterprise procurement teams are embedding cyber clauses and CVE SLAs into RFPs as standard practice.
Firmware signing expectations: Signed firmware and secure boot on accessories will become table stakes for enterprise purchases.
Vendor consolidation: Expect larger platform players to insist on partner compliance with security baselines for Fast Pair and similar protocols.

Practical templates: Language to include in RFPs and contracts

Use this sample clause when buying audio accessories at scale:

“Vendor must provide a documented vulnerability disclosure process and a named security contact. For critical vulnerabilities affecting device confidentiality or microphone access, vendor will provide a fix and distribution mechanism within 30 calendar days of coordinated disclosure. Firmware must be cryptographically signed and include rollback protection. Vendor will provide CVE-assigned advisories and update logs for devices covered under this contract.”

Also require delivery items: firmware signing key lifecycle documentation, OTA update API details, and a 3-year firmware support commitment for each contracted model.

What to do if a vendor response is slow or non-existent

Escalate via formal procurement — issue a security notice and reference contract SLA clauses.
Use temporary technical controls: disable affected features (Fast Pair), revoke device trust via MDM, require wired alternatives for sensitive teams.
Request third-party mitigation guidance — ask the vendor for any mitigations that can be applied in-device or in mobile OS settings.
As a last resort, deprovision the model for production use and source alternative vendors with proven enterprise support.

Final recommendations — what to buy and what to avoid today

For regulated communications or high-risk environments in 2026:

Prefer platform-aligned accessories (Google/Apple partner-certified) with clear update and disclosure records.
Favor professional/enterprise models from Sony, Bose, Sennheiser — they typically offer longer firmware support and business services.
Use Anker/Soundcore for cost-effective remote-provisioning only if you secure contract SLAs and verify update paths.
Exercise caution with smaller or less-transparent brands (including some products from newer entrants like Nothing) until they can demonstrate enterprise-grade update and disclosure processes.

Closing — procurement checklist (one page)

Inventory: collect model numbers + firmware for all audio accessories.
Policy: disable Fast Pair where not needed; enforce mic use controls via MDM.
RFP: include firmware signing, CVE SLA, OTA/bulk update API, and indemnity clauses.
Verification: request recent security advisories, CVE lists, and third-party audit reports before purchase.
Operations: stage and pilot all firmware before mass deployment; keep a rollback contingency.

Call to action

If you’re managing a device fleet, start by running an accessory inventory and pressing vendors for their security contacts and CVE histories. Need a ready-made RFP security addendum or a 30/60/90 remediation plan you can deploy in 24–48 hours? Contact our procurement desk for tailored templates and vendor negotiation support — or download the free procurement security checklist available on our site.

Sources and further reading

KU Leuven Computer Security and Industrial Cryptography group — WhisperPair research (Jan 2026)
Wired — coverage of the Fast Pair vulnerabilities and affected models (Jan 2026)
The Verge — reporting on affected Sony WH-1000XM models (Jan 2026)
Vendor security advisories and CVE databases — consult vendor sites and NVD for model-specific entries

disks

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.